Should the Internet be censored? Essay
861 Words4 Pages
Should the Internet be censored?
From colonial times to the present, the media in America has been subject to censorship challenges and regulations. The Internet has become a vast sea of opportunity. Everyone is seizing the moment. The good and the bad of society have reduced the meaning of the Internet. Menace threatens each onlooker, as people browse the many pages of Cyberspace. As the new technological advances help to shape our society, one cannot help but think of the dangers waiting to prey on anyone. The Internet should be censored, because there needs to be some protection against the criminal minds that dwell in society. If the problems concerning the Internet are not irradiated in its early stage now, it could fester into…show more content…
Censoring the Internet would fundamentally harm and destroy the quality that makes it most popular, which is freedom (Landier, 1997). The Internet has grown as an acceptable media of exchange around the globe. People enjoy the idea of logging on, talking to and or mailing hundreds of people across the world. If society felt their every action was monitored, the morale of the Cyber world as a whole would eventually dwindle away until ultimately, there was no more.
With the lack of censorship this means that, unlike any other form of communication available today, the Internet is open to abuse and misuse in a number of ways. With anyone using the World Wide Web, anyone can abuse it. Data can be transmitted anonymously and secretly. Sex rings have used the Internet to trade in pictures and to encourage their immoral and sick habits. There is no way of knowing someone’s age on the internet so it is virtually impossible to stop juveniles using it to access pornography and various other types of data (EPIC, 1997). With the Internet being such a vast ocean of possibilities the Internet could “drown” in its own despair”. Hiding behind the curtain of free speech could turn an Information Superhighway into a highway that is now “closed for construction”.
The Communications Decency Act “attempts to ban the transmission of obscene or indecent material across the Internet (Communications Decency Act Main Page, 1997). The
I believe that the Internet is a good source of information on a wide variety of subjects. I have personally used the Internet for a year now and have found it very useful for helping me with my school work as well as being very entertaining. However I have been deterred by some of the information that is easily accessible and that anyone could look at such as, detailed instructions on how to make harmful or fatal explosives and illegal pornographic material. Growing concern about the availability of such material has provoked attempts to try and censor the Internet and restrict the access of harmful material.
In June of 1996, the American Court of Appeals looked into the issue of Internet censorship to determine what could be done about indecency on the net. The argument was about pornography on the Internet and whether it should be made illegal. The plaintiffs wanted to make it an offence to view/host an Internet site containing illegal pornography, mainly child pornography. The court argued that it was against the constitutional rights but these motions were granted to create the Communications Decency Act.
In this essay I shall look at reasons why censorship on the Internet would be a good idea as well as looking at reasons against this issue.
One reason supporting censoring the Internet is that of stopping people, mainly children, from getting access to unsuitable material. Explicit pornography is easily accessible on the net and children who use the Internet can be subjected to it. Pornography is illegal to view in most countries but because the Internet does not belong to any country, national laws aren t applicable and this is why pornography is hard to ban. Parents worry that their children may be disturbed if they access pornography so Internet filters have been developed to restrict people from getting hold of indecent material. Although pornography is a big issue on the Internet it is not the only material that is thought of as damaging . Information on how to make explosives is widespread as well as racially abusive material and for these reasons some unsuccessful attempts, mainly in American courts, to ban harmful material on the Internet have been made.
Another reason in favour of the censorship of the Internet is to stop the misuse of copyrighted material on the Internet. Things like music, pictures and films have been put on the Internet against the will of those who own the copyrights and it is difficult for them to stop this from continuing. Even though it is illegal people still use such material on the Internet because it is so easily available and free. Because it is free I feel that the copyright owners rights are being violated. Some things have been done towards stopping this for example, the record company, Geffen/DGC have said that only thirty seconds of their music can be played on the Internet and that they will take extreme action against those who ignore this motion. I do not think that it will be possible to stop copyrighted material from being put on the Internet because it is so widespread which makes it hard to regulate.
A reason against the censorship of the Internet is freedom of speech. People have a right to express themselves and to censor the Internet would be a violation of this right. The Internet is a good way to communicate and learn and if it is going to continue like that it must not be censored. The information people observe should not be regulated to what is obscene because people have different views and make different decisions . What is wrong or immoral to one person may be perfectly acceptable to another. Everyone also has a choice what they view when using the Internet and indecent material isn't forced in front of people just as people aren t forced to do what they don t want. A court case in America which is in favour of this view is one that took place in 1957. The Supreme Court decided that ...indecency standards cannot be applied to printed material, which brings up the argument, is the Internet a printed media or is it broadcast?
Broadcasting signals come through the walls of our homes regardless of whether or not we want them and are considered uninvited but books, magazines and other printed material must be physically brought into our homes so are invited thus cannot be censored. This reason opposing Internet censorship is often overlooked which I think is unjust.
My views on Internet censorship are mixed. I think that everyone has a right to be able to look at anything on the Internet and do not think it should be strongly censored but I do think that Internet regulations should be stricter, making it harder for minors to access explicit material. Overall I don t think the Internet will change much from how it is now and I think that there will still be the same issues surrounding it, but I think these issues should not be portrayed as being what the Internet is all about and I hope the Internet will be associated as being a good source of information and entertainment.